Incumbent providers, grown lazy on a steady diet of public subsidies and monopoly rents, have done their best to cast this as a debate between efficient private competitors and inefficient government monopolies. But it is the incumbents that would rather regulate than compete. They resist municipal entry not because it is incompetent – no one resists incompetent competitors – or because it is unnecessary. Rather incumbents resist municipal entry because they recognize the ability of local government to offer a genuine competitive alternative to a high priced monopoly or duopoly services.
at&t audio broadband bits cable chattanooga colorado comcast competition county economic development fcc fiber-to-the-business financing FTTH georgia gigabit I-Net incumbent interview jobs legislation lobbying minnesota misinformation muni north carolina open access podcast policy preemption public v private referendum regulation rural school services state laws stimulus tennessee time warner cable utility video washington Wi-Fi Wireless