It is duplicitous to suggest that the incumbents represent the “free market” against “government-subsidized” municipal networks. Incumbents are incumbents precisely because they have had the weight and resources of government to back them up for years. Furthermore, they have had backing from those levels of government - the federal and state - which are least pervious to direct participation by local residents. Municipal networks, funded by the public and accountable to the public, represent a balance to the domination of telecommunications infrastructure by huge corporations which have long enjoyed substantial government subsidy. Banning or restricting municipal networks will end this effort to create a level playing field.
at&t audio broadband bits cable chattanooga christopher mitchell colorado comcast competition economic development fcc fiber-to-the-business financing FTTH gigabit I-Net incumbent interview jobs lafayette legislation lobbying minnesota muni network neutrality north carolina open access podcast policy preemption public v private referendum regulation rural school services state laws stimulus tennessee time warner cable utility video washington Wi-Fi Wireless