Image
Fast, affordable Internet access for all.
"Not Feasible" May Be A Reflection of the Consultant Rather Than A Community Network
By
on
To be fair, "not feasible" could also mean that you are asking the wrong questions. Nothing rules out that the problem lies with both the consultant AND the questions. It's hard to tell from the outside which of these factors dominates.
An Incomplete Path
For years, Iowa's Decorah has been considering a municipal fiber network and local folks have been educating people on the possibilities. With so many other communities in Iowa moving forward successfully with projects, one would have thought Decorah might snag one of the consultants involved in those. It went instead with Uptown Services.
We generally don't name consultants unless we feel compelled to on this site but Uptown Services was also the consultant the last time I saw such a poor feasibility that I couldn't avoid writing about it - in Hillsboro, Oregon. They were also the consultant for Provo, Utah; Alameda, California; Salisbury, North Carolina; and other networks that have encountered significant challenges in their business plans. We don't know what role, if any, the consultants played in their struggles and, to be fair, Uptown Services has contracted with networks that have avoided any serious pitfalls.
I have no way of evaluating the many services they provide, but I can say that cities looking for feasibility analysis and early guidance in how to improve Internet access in a community should carefully consider their track record.
What upsets me is not that Uptown told Hillsboro and Decorah that a bond-financed rapid-deployment of citywide FTTH was too risky in their analysis. That may or may not be correct - and I deeply respect consultants that are willing to tell clients what they do not want to hear. The problem is that a consultant's job should not be to say "yeah" or "nay" for one particular approach but rather to guide a community along a feasible path of improving Internet access.
We have seen examples of communities where they found building a citywide fiber network at once to be too risky for their appetite. Rather than giving up and foregoing the essential benefits of high-quality Internet access in the modern era, they set about building an incremental or phased approach. See our interviews with Auburn, Indiana and Erwin, Tennessee for two solid examples.
As time goes on, we believe these phased approaches will be more important because the market will continue to fracture - for instance, mobile wireless services will not meet the need of most residents but some fraction will use it to substitute for fixed access.
As I read the Decorah RFP, I notice that the city included language that seems to have been open to such an analysis:
The utility commission seeks an independent third-party contractor to conduct a study of the current status of local network facilities and services, alternative network designs for optimization of local fiber optic resources, business model alternatives and operational implications, and recommendations to the utility commission’s task force for further action on the envisioned project.
It is possible that conversations with the utility board directed Uptown to be rigid and banal in their assessment. I don't know. What I do know is that communities should learn from this experience - including Decorah.
This is the "Feasibility Study" that Uptown gave back to Decorah: a basic slide deck. I have long advocated that communities demand much more in a feasibility study - below are links to 5 interviews offering insight about what is important to ask and what products should result from a feasibility study.
The bare minimum in my mind is a spreadsheet that allows a community to understand how the model works. What happens if a take rate is higher or lower than expected? Change a cell and find out. What happens if something goes over budget? These are the things communities should understand before they make any final decisions. Beyond that, maps and some engineering should also be included. Communities need guidance, not a yes or no.
With the right questions and consultants that are both capable and willing to work with the community, the worst that will happen is a short-term plan for modest investment and the potential to re-evaluate as technology progresses and the economics change. That is far, far preferable to the headline in Decorah "Study shows Fast Fiber not feasible" when the city already has some fiber assets available and the public is overwhelmingly in favor of a municipal nework according to multiple surveys.
The Uptown survey showed 68 percent of respondents said they would prefer to take service from the city compared to CenturyLink (3 percent), Mediacom (8 percent), "a new provider" (4 percent) and 18 percent that didn't know. Results like these indicate a deep dissatisfaction with the current state of local connectivity that requires further exploration.
Are there any recommendations for how Decorah should move forward? Not in the feasibility study. This should be just as unacceptable as it is unhelpful.
If Decorah doesn't want to move forward, they should be free to make that decision. Frankly, I would be looking more closely at what several of the recent and soon-to-be municipal fiber networks are doing elsewhere in Iowa and who is advising them. I doubt Decorah is really that different and others working in the state for years have confirmed my assumption.
But the larger lesson every other community should take away from this is that hiring a consultant should be more about hand-holding and guidance than "please evaluate this single model without any deviation." The consultant should help you understand how better Internet connectivity can improve your community and what feasible options you have to move in that direction.
Learn More
Here are a collection of interviews we have done that offer insights in what a community should consider in the early phases of considering a network. Each of these has a transcript linked from the text of the story.
- Eric Lampland of Lookout Point
- Diane Kruse of NeoConnect
- Joanne Hovis of CTC
- Kyle Hollifield of Magellan Advisors
- Chad Ganzer and Carmen O'Neill of Vantage Point
Update
CCG Consulting wrote a related piece that I think also has some good advice, particularly for communities that are very focused on a single model.
Image of Deborah’s Winneshiek Courthouse by Bobak Ha'Eri (Own work) [CC BY 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons.
Related Stories
Municipal Broadband Networks Deliver On Affordability Before And After ACP
In a recently published piece in The American Prospect, Sean Gonsalves, ILSR's Community Broadband Networks Initiative Associate Director for Communications, reports on four cities across the U.S. that are well prepared to deal with the demise of the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP).
Edison, New Jersey Inches Forward On Municipal Broadband Plan
Edison, New Jersey officials are moving forward on a municipal fiber plan built on the back of a $2 million American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) grant. However, the full cost and scope of Edison’s as-yet-unfinished plan remains unclear.
New Municipal Broadband Networks Skyrocket in Post-Pandemic America As Alternative To Private Monopoly Model
As the new year begins, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) announced today its latest tally of municipal broadband networks which shows a dramatic surge in the number of communities building publicly-owned, locally controlled high-speed Internet infrastructure over the last three years. Since January 1, 2021, at least 47 new municipal networks have come online with dozens of other projects still in the planning or pre-construction phase, which includes the possibility of building 40 new municipal networks in California alone.
Waterloo Fiber Launches Trial Ahead Of February Commercial Launch
Waterloo, Iowa’s municipal broadband project has taken a major step forward after nearly two decades of planning. Waterloo Fiber officials just launched their first limited fiber trial, will connect their first commercial customers in February, and are on target to deploy affordable fiber at speeds up to 10 gigabit per second (Gbps) to every last city resident by 2026. Construction of the network began last summer at a groundbreaking ceremony hosted by Waterloo Mayor Quentin Hart. Last month the city connected the first of four participants in a limited pilot project.
Decorah, Iowa Inches Closer To City-Owned Fiber Build With Plan To Reach Finish Line
Decorah, Iowa is moving forward on a long-percolating plan to expand the city’s core fiber ring to provide affordable broadband access to long-neglected residents and businesses. While the project has been discussed for years, local officials tell ISLR the project gained renewed momentum during peak COVID, and is creeping closer to launch. While contracts are still being finalized, the city hopes to spend somewhere around $12 to $15 million to deliver fiber to all 3,000 potential subscriber locations.
Waterloo, Iowa Unveils Affordable Pricing For City-Owned Fiber Build
After years of strategizing, Waterloo, Iowa officials unveiled a new website for the city's fiber-to-the-home project and annouced service pricing. The city’s network will cost $115 million, take roughly three years to build, and ultimately deliver affordable fiber access at speeds up to 10 Gbps to all municipal buildings, anchor institutions, and all 67,695 city residents.