We consider how government-owned enterprises affect privately owned rivals. Specifically, we compare the types of markets that municipally owned telecommunications providers in the United States serve to the types of markets that competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) serve. We find that CLECs focus on potential profitability while municipalities appear to respond to other factors, such as political considerations or the desire to provide competition to incumbents. As a result, municipal providers tend to serve markets that CLECs do not. We also find that the presence of a municipal provider in a market does not affect the probability that a CLEC also serves that market. Our results suggest municipalities may not pose a significant competitive threat to CLECs and do not preclude CLEC participation.
Bureaucrats as Entrepreneurs: Do Municipal Telecommunications Providers Hinder Private Entrepreneurs?
Publication Date:
Monday, 2008, January 14
Related Stories
- Empirical Study: Does Municipal Supply of Communications Crowd-Out Private Communications Investment?
- How Chattanooga, Bristol, and Lafayette Built the Best Broadband in America
- Broadband and Economic Development: A Municipal Case Study from Florida
- Publicly Owned Broadband Networks: Averting the Looming Broadband Monopoly
- Is Publicly Owned Information Infrastructure A Wise Public Investment for San Francisco?